Consumer-protection suit dismissed
A plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its consumer-protection lawsuit against Showalter PLLC’s client, a company that sells products online, after Showalter PLLC forcefully laid out the client’s theory of the case.
Showalter PLLC
Founded in 2026, Showalter PLLC is already winning cases for its clients.
A plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its consumer-protection lawsuit against Showalter PLLC’s client, a company that sells products online, after Showalter PLLC forcefully laid out the client’s theory of the case.
Showalter PLLC represented a startup selling one of its business lines and closed the $1.8 million sale.
For a lender whose borrowers defaulted on a loan and began dissipating assets, Showalter PLLC obtained an emergency ex parte temporary restraining order and then a default judgment.
A prospective plaintiff sent a demand letter threatening to sue Showalter PLLC’s client, a technology company. After Showalter PLLC forcefully responded to the demand letter, the prospective plaintiff did not file suit.
A company sued Showalter PLLC’s client in a commercial dispute, and the case settled after Showalter PLLC filed the client’s answer and affirmative defenses.
In a landlord-tenant case, the court granted Showalter PLLC’s motion for default against all defendants.
A sample of the victories the firm’s lawyers won at their prior firms.
In SEC v. Jarkesy (2024), his amicus brief for telecommunications trade associations made arguments that Justice Neil Gorsuch later advanced in his concurring opinion.
In Hikvision USA, Inc. v. FCC (2024), he represented Motorola Solutions as intervenor and won a near-total victory.
In TikTok Inc. v. Garland (2024), he represented former FCC Chairman Ajit Pai as amicus curiae supporting the government, which prevailed.
He represented an acquiror in a $300 million sale of hospitals and a healthcare practice in a $40 million sale to private equity.
He represented a medical-device manufacturer in post-trial motions that reduced a punitive-damages award from $22 million to $3 million.
He identified and developed a statutory-interpretation argument that the hornbooks and all six courts to address it had rejected, but it won in federal district court.
He represented an issuer in a $21 million convertible-notes offering and investors in $30 million and $20 million minority investments.
Two years out of law school, he defeated Microsoft while litigating pro se on behalf of a web platform he founded.
He represented an indigent criminal defendant in a successful Fourth Amendment challenge to a conviction.